The Efficiency Trap: Why the "AI-Only" Brand is a Temporary Phase in PPC Marketing

We are currently navigating what I call the "Early Transitional Age of LLMs." It is a period defined by a singular, seductive idea: that Large Language Models can effectively zero-out operational expenses by replacing human experts.

On paper, the math looks great. If an LLM can write copy, analyze spreadsheets, and "manage" accounts, why keep the agency? Why keep the in-house technical lead? But as the initial novelty wears off, brand operators are starting to hit some uncomfortable truths that don't show up on a pitch deck.

The Subject Matter Fallacy

There’s a common belief that "prompting" is a general skill that replaces specialized knowledge. It’s actually the opposite. To get anything useful out of an AI in a technical field, you have to be an expert in that field first.

You aren't just giving the AI a task; you are auditing its output. If you don’t deeply understand the nuances of, say, bidding strategies or attribution models, you won't know when the AI is giving you a Hallucination-Standard™ answer. You can't delegate what you don't understand.

The "Hidden" Opportunity Cost

Every executive has a limited amount of "deep work" hours. We’re seeing founders spend hours "engineering" the perfect prompt to save a few thousand dollars a month.

What they eventually realize is that they’ve effectively hired themselves as a mid-level technician. At some point, the realization hits: This is why I used to pay someone else. The time spent wrestling with an LLM to get it to produce execution-ready work is time taken away from high-level strategy and growth.

The Knowledge Decay Problem

LLMs, by their nature, are lagging indicators. They are trained on data sets that are often months or years behind the current reality.

In a field like Google Ads, where the UI changes frequently and "best practices" shift based on whatever new automation Google is pushing this week, the AI is often working off a map of a city that has since been torn down. If an LLM is basing its "agentic" actions on a 2022 help document, you aren't gaining efficiency, you're gaining technical debt.

The Future of the Technical Marketer

So, where does this leave us? I suspect the "death of the agency" has been greatly exaggerated.

The real casualty of the AI era will likely be the in-house technical marketer. If an agency can use AI to streamline its processes and manage 50 accounts with the same headcount it used to need for 10, their fees will naturally shift downward. When an agency can offer high-level expertise and AI-driven efficiency for a few thousand dollars a month, it becomes nearly impossible for a brand to justify a $150,000 salary for a single in-house person to do the same thing.

I believe we will see a "boomerang effect." Brands will move away from the "do-it-all-with-AI" model and return to agencies, not because they can't use the tools, but because the agency can use those tools more efficiently across a broader dataset, for a much lower cost than a full-time hire.

The long-term winner isn't the AI. It's the human expert who knows how to make the AI work without letting it drive the car off a cliff.

The Shift to Specialist Agencies from Mega HoldCo Agencies

Final note... let's be clear, there is agency bloat out there, to be sure, that likely needs to be eliminated. So to finish up this post, I want to acknowledge that. If your agency holdco is charging $25K/mo for your Google Ads team to have a Brand campaign live that they ignore... you're definitely getting (rightfully) eliminiated in the new era of AI.

‍
At the end of the day, a $20/month subscription doesn't give you a strategy; it gives you a very fast way to make mistakes at scale. The agencies that survive will be the ones that realize they aren't selling 'work' anymore... they're selling the 'judgment' that the AI doesn't have.
‍

All that to say, a lot is changing, there are sure to be a whole lot of opinions yet to come. So join us in hanging on for the ride!

Oh, and if you need a knowledgeable, affordable, curious, and detail-oriented Google Ads agency who operates more like consultants than the traditional agency model... let us know ;) 

‍

‍