Let’s talk Smart Shopping New Customer Acquisition conversion goals. I can hear your heart beating faster already from the anticipation of that first sentence. What joys and excitement must lie ahead of us with such an opening!
Self-teasing aside, as I have written previously, it is alarming that Smart Shopping campaigns (SSC) do not reveal how much traffic they are sending to remarketing lists (return visitors), and non-remarketing lists (colder, more upper funnel visitors… though not necessarily upper funnel. They’re just not remarketing visitors.). There has long been an advertiser concern of whether SSC actually does raise incremental value for a business, or whether it simply leans too heavily into remarketing visitors on say, YouTube and GDN. If the latter were true, this of course would be a completely unfair analysis when comparing SSC to Standard Shopping campaigns… especially since Standard excels at targeting more upper funnel searches not always visibly evident with tracked sales, and thus will always lose a lower funnel tracked sales match with SSC. “Don’t strangle the funnel”, one might caution.
This has been on Google’s radar for quite awhile based on conversations I’ve had with Googlers since the beginning of the SSC campaign type so when they first introduced their New Customer Acquisition conversion options I was excited. This appeared to be a way to segment new and return people, and to target new customers more aggressively than those who would simply re-purchase through a brand search, or email program anyway… i.e., no incremental value allowed.
As with everything Smart Shopping, it seems, the more I have researched these, the more it seems prudent to discuss the cautions not immediately visible in this new addition to an already controversial program type. The program itself isn’t a complete failure, but there are some crucial concerns to consider if you are interested in implementing:
1) New Purchasers, Not Visitors.
Wow, it would be great to now identify what spend levels are going towards remarketing and not cold audience growth within Smart Shopping, right?!
Hold up, screeching brake noise.
This doesn’t show you that.
This is new purchasers, not visitors.
That difference is crucial to understand. This means you can adjust your conversion targets in your SSC campaigns based solely on whether a person (tracked, of course) has converted within the past 540 days.
Do you want to know how many of your SSC conversions are coming from return visits and new visits? You still can’t know that through the Google Ads UI (there are ways to hack together insights with Google Analytics to do this, but not in Google Ads). I think this is an important point to be aware of, and unless you are advertising for a store with a lot of repeat visits, this might not be as helpful for you as initially you thought.
2) Inflated (made-up) Conversion Values Reported
This is really my primary concern, and is one that shouldn’t be taken lightly.
Here is how the system works. You sell a product for $100. You tell Google that a new customer is worth $50 more to you than a return customer. You have done lots of math and cool equations, and know your customer well. Nice work!
Here is what Google does with that, now that you have told them you value a new customer $50 more.
THEY ADD $50 TO YOUR REPORTED “CONVERSION VALUE” COLUMN. Note, this will impact your reported ROAS (conv value. / cost) as well.
“Wait! Just a second! I think a new customer is $50 more valuable than a return customer, but that doesn’t mean I want to add $50 of fake money to my reported revenue! My revenue is what it is, where did that $50 come from? It’s simply the value I place over the return customer!” You exclaim to Google. *crickets* is the reply.
This means if your company actually makes $100 from that new customer sale, Google Ads is now reporting your conversion value tracked to SSC as $150. It’s literally a made-up $50 that gives SSC more credit than it should receive, and to be honest, that angers me a little. Sure, conversion value doesn’t necessarily equate to revenue, but I would argue that’s the primary way conversion value is understood by most users… which means it’s messing with our reported revenue numbers.
Now to be fair to Google here, a rep has informed me they are planning on breaking this out into separate columns eventually, but this has not taken place yet.
Be cautious of this in the meantime!
Watch Out for Bad Actors
I’m going to tell on my agency neighbors who may have bad intentions here. This also means, your PPC agency could be doubling their reported conversions for SSC whenever it is a new customer. What is to stop an agency (or employee!) from taking over an account, adding $500 fake revenue to every new customer purchase from SSC, and then reporting their overwhelming success while you are stuck scratching your head wondering why their numbers aren’t adding up to your internal numbers.
“Attribution” they tell you.
“Riiiiiggggghhhhhttttt…..” is my response. As always, hiring someone you trust is essential for things like this, that you may not even realize are happening. Character counts.
3) Unnecessarily Over-complicated. Bonus: My Recommendation
While adding fake money to an account is always a bad idea, calculating various estimates of revenue you want to over-value your new customers at is also quite complicated. And, in my opinion, it is also quite unnecessary.
I would suggest what I believe to be a better route:
Most Ecommerce accounts we manage already have a basic view of the value between their return and new customers (heck, even visitors!), and this is nearly always (in my experience) reflected in ROAS goals.
Whereas we may have a 2x (200%) ROAS goal for new customers, we might have a 5x (500%) ROAS goal for repeat customers. So my suggestion to Google, is to ditch the crazy math addition scheme of adding fake money into the reported sales of the account, and simply allow us to tell you the two separate ROAS goals we want your system to aim at. Then we could see reported ROAS and revenue values, using the actual revenue tracked to those goals (no fake money required) segmented between new/returning. Just a thought!
Finally, I have two suggestions. If you’re not sure what you think about this, test it in one of your accounts by adding $1 into the New Customer slot and monitoring. Then you can see what sort of insights you uncover from your own testing without tanking your reporting with (too much) made-up revenue. Second, add in the conversion column for “New Customers” into your Google Ads reporting so you can begin seeing how many Google is reporting as coming through your SSC campaigns. It’s not new visitors, but at least it’s more information than we used to get!
With the data black hole that is Smart Shopping, we’ll take all the insights we can get.
Psssst, hey! Want to keep learning about Smart Shopping? Check out PPCKirk’s Udemy course, jam-packed with 5 hours of exhaustive content on everything from feed tips, to SSC structure, and ad creative recommendations. It’s the kind of thing people pay lots and lots of money for, but we’re selling it for $69.99. It also comes with exclusive access to a private Shopping Ads Facebook group where you can discuss Shopping Ads with your classmates, and get questions answered directly by Kirk himself. Grab the course now!